Core Ads Foundational Study
A foundational study into how small businesses actually create ads in Meta Business Suite, versus the workflow the product assumed they were using.
Nobody had asked small business advertisers what they were actually doing
Meta Business Suite’s Core Ads team had plenty of usage data on small-business advertisers, but usage data tells you what people clicked. It doesn’t tell you what they were trying to do or where they got stuck. This was the team’s first deep dive into that gap: understand the actual ad-creation journey for small business owners, and turn that into a shared, evidence-based starting point for the roadmap.
Seven advertisers, 60 minutes each, deliberately picked for range
I led the study end to end: recruitment criteria, interview guide, moderation, synthesis, and the recommendations that came out of it. Rather than recruit a convenience sample, I deliberately spread the seven participants across both advertising experience and campaign goal, from people who’d run paid campaigns for years to people who’d barely started, brand awareness versus direct sales, and across genuinely different small businesses: a government communications role, a nonprofit educator, a local food business, a family farm, an artisanal goods shop, and others. Each did a 60-minute moderated remote interview walking through how they actually built and ran a campaign.
Most weren’t following a strategy so much as repeating what worked last time
Three findings mattered more than the rest:
- 01No deliberate strategy.
6 of 7 participants relied on trial-and-error, repeating whatever had worked in a previous campaign, with no real sense of why it had worked.
- 02The tool outpaced the user.
5 of 7 started with almost no working knowledge of advertising itself, and wanted structured education rather than another feature to learn.
- 03Discoverability was the real gap.
6 of 7 preferred building ad creative in outside tools like Canva or Adobe, and a related 5 of 7 almost never opened the app's own Home page at all.
People weren't ignoring those features because they didn't need them. They'd built their entire workflow around the parts of the product they'd already discovered, and simply never found the rest.
"If we didn't experiment with our content, we never would have known about this." Participant, small business advertiser
Alongside the three strategic themes, the sessions also surfaced smaller, concrete usability issues worth fixing on their own terms:
- Performance metrics that go up or down with no explanation of why3 of 7
- A Home page participants routinely skipped past to reach Planner, Scheduler, or Insights directly3 of 7
- Audience creation taking noticeably longer without the automated targeting option3 of 7
- Ad-preview lag that read as a bug rather than a loading state2 of 7
Recommendations aimed at the moment people felt lost
The recommendations followed the evidence: contextual, tooltip-level guidance tied to the specific point in the flow where people hesitated, an in-product onboarding path aimed at the discoverability gap specifically since the missing features already existed and didn’t need to be rebuilt, and a case for structured ads education, responding directly to how many participants said they’d learned everything through trial-and-error. This study became one of the foundational inputs the Core Ads team used to prioritize what shipped next.
of 7 participants
Prefer external tools (Canva, Adobe) over Business Suite's own content tools
Rely on trial-and-error rather than a deliberate strategy to find what works
Started with little to no working knowledge of how ads or ad terminology work
Rarely or never engage with the app's own Home page
Named discoverability of existing features as the single biggest gap